Don’t Mention the Empire!


The British Empire holds a strange place in the UK’s national memory; many young people have little knowledge of it while many older people remember it fondly, with 65% of over 65s in a YouGov poll saying the Empire was something to be proud of in 2014.[1] Considering that the British Empire lasted for 500 years, it is rarely talked about, usually only brought up when talking about immigration or invoked as a nostalgic tool to invoke ‘Britannia’ in relation to issues such as Brexit.[2] Actual detail is rarely mentioned, it’s rarely covered in film or TV despite the UK’s love of period drama and the teaching of it in schools is minor, if existent at all.

I was never taught about the British Empire in school. I was never even taught about the slave trade, except for brief mentions during Black History Month – and then only the USA’s role was mentioned. I know some people a little younger than me at least were taught about the slave trade and going back to my parents’ school days of the 1960s and 1970s, the slave trade was mentioned. The British Empire overall though was barely touched upon. While teaching of the British Empire has reportedly been improved upon in recent years, it is still patchy due to a focus on certain aspects or periods of the Empire.

The problem with teaching about the British Empire is that it isn’t easy and it doesn’t make Britain look good. Take the teaching of World War Two in Britain – the Nazis were clearly evil and we fought against them, so we’re the good guys! Great detail is gone into on the Nazi atrocities, quite rightly. However any evil done by the British is glossed over to preserve the dichotomy. No talk of handing over Czechoslovakia to Hitler prior to the war; or the bombing of German civilians; or the British government doing nothing to help victims of Nazi persecution (the famous Kindertransport children were only allowed to enter the country if a non-governmental organisation found them a place to stay and a £50 bond per child was paid); the internment of those who came from countries who were part of the Axis Powers; and the blind eye turned to the rape of women and children, committed by Allied troops, by the Allied leadership to name a few. Acknowledging the atrocities committed by the Allies does not make the Nazis look at any better, nor does it mean disrespecting those who died – they were not the government. Acknowledging these atrocities does however damage the myth of a heroic Britain, of a past we should be proud of. That is exactly why the British Empire is such a touchy subject.

Exact numbers of those who died at the hands of the British Empire will never be known, and no estimation will ever be agreed on but let’s take a look at a couple of generally accepted figures. 3.1 million Africans were transported by the British to its colonies and other countries.[3] 1 million (at least) died in the Irish Potato Famine, while the British government exported food from Ireland and British landlords evicted families.[4] 4.3 million died in the Southern India famine of 1876–78, while the British government exported food from India and refused to provide any charity, instead forcing the starving to work for rations that were not enough to sustain them.[5] At least 28,000 Boer women and children and 20,000 Black people died in one of the earliest examples of concentration camps, created by the British Army during the Second Boer War.[6] These uncomplicated figures are enough to cause horror for any person with something resembling a moral compass. These are indefensible. These were civilians; the excuse of ‘they were attacking us’ just simply doesn’t count for these examples.

Now there are people who claim that the British Empire was a force for good, a highly controversial claim among many historians, but the major problem with the lack of education or thorough discussion of the Empire outside academic circles means that these claims are fed uncritically to the public almost always via newspapers and politicians who are using this argument for their own political means. For example, if we refer back to the atrocities above, the Daily Mail in one article claimed that during the British Empire ‘the occasional massacre was undoubtedly carried out’ but we played a role in ending the slave trade and ‘successfully exported’ democracy to countries that were colonies.[7] This of course shows a rather dismissive attitude to the deaths of millions and conveniently leaves out the British role in beginning the slave trade. This is not exactly unsurprising when you consider even Wikipedia refuses to use the Daily Mail as a source; that such an article makes no attempt to even vaguely consider history properly. It is also understandable in some respects why newspapers like the Daily Mail aggressively pursue such a position; they do not exist to teach history – or even tell the truth – they are there to push a particular opinion onto readers in the hope that readers will support their political aims at the ballot box to financially support their owners. This, of course, is not confined to just right-wing newspapers but to newspapers in general.

The problem is that when many peoples’ knowledge comes from journalists set on achieving political goals the actual debate and evidence of the Empire is not present. While historians cannot escape ideology completely, at least there is some kind of attempt at being critical of their perspectives and examining evidence. If an argument is to be made that the British Empire was ‘good’ then it should be put forward properly evidenced with historical rigour, with an actual chance of experts being able to debate the argument for its historical accuracy rather than political value. This is why it is so important that the British Empire is actually taught in schools so students have a chance to critically engage with the history rather than be fed carefully condensed politicised propaganda. An evidenced debate in schools has been favoured by school leaders and historians over a curriculum based on fostering patriotism.[8] This approach has also been favoured by students themselves.[9]

The lack of knowledge about the British Empire is particularly problematic because of how much of an impact it is having today. The British Empire created Apartheid in South Africa, and continued to resist imposing sanctions on the government till the end. Claims of violence between black and white South Africans has recently been the subject of interest amongst Trump supporters. The British Empire played a large part in the beginnings of the Israel-Palestine conflict, perhaps the most controversial conflict in modern history. After pitting Hindus and Muslims against each other for the British Empire’s own gain, the rushed partition of India helped cause the bloody legacy of the events of the partition that still plagues the relationship between India and Pakistan today. Intervention in Afghanistan began with the British Empire and the volatile state of the country can be linked back to British installed puppet governments. Proper understanding of these current events cannot be achieved without the knowledge of what past events caused them, and in so many cases the British Empire played some part.

It is even still having an impact on government policy as seen with the recent Windrush scandal with those who came to Britain and their descendants from former colonies in the Caribbean being threatened with deportation. The disregard for these people who spent their early lives under colonial control and then came to rebuild the UK due to lack of work available in their own countries because of colonial policy, all while having to cope with racism and poverty when they came to Britain. The recent scandal led to many of these people facing racism and poverty all over again; with many arguing that such behaviour would have never happened to white immigrants and that the decision to destroy records was racially charged. Whether such assertions are true or not, there is certainly an issue that being former colonial subjects that their history was not considered as important as white Britons.

Despite such claims that the British Empire was a good thing, even from politicians in government, there is a strong suggestion that perhaps the British government aren’t quite as proud about it as they claim. In 2011 a group of elderly Kenyans won the right to sue the British government for the torture they allege they suffered in the Mau Mau rebellion against the Empire. As a result of this an official review of colonial government papers, which unlike most government papers had not been passed onto the National Archives, was undertaken. The review found that they had been purposefully hidden, and that also thousands had been disposed of with the expressed intention by the secretary of state for the colonies so that any records that “might embarrass Her Majesty’s government” should be destroyed.[10]













4 thoughts on “Don’t Mention the Empire!

  1. Hmm, an interesting post, but one that I fear suffers from its own implicit bias. No mention, for instance is made by the atrocities perpetrated by the Mau Mau. Which is not a surprise since they have been singularly ignored by the media and historians alike. Which speaks of an implicit assumption that any act of violence perpetrated by an ‘oppressed’ people against their ‘oppressors’ is ‘justified’ even if it’s against women, children, and combatants. Or was it because most of the people they killed were their fellow black Africans from neighbouring tribes?

    As for South Africa, it should further be stated that the British were no responsible for every ill perpetrated in that country. Most people know about Apartheid and the Boer War, but they do not know about Shaka Zulu. for example. A man who, whilst he is considered a hero by his own Zulu people, killed and displaced many thousands of his fellow black Africans from neighbouring tribes, in what was basically a campaign of conquest.

    Nor are they aware that the San Bushman are in fact, the true indigenous people of South Africa, but only represent about 1% of the population today. Considering this, claiming the problems in South Africa today are all down to the British Empire is simply naive. The treatment of white farmers has as much to do with the forced land appropriation policy of the ANC: a party known to have had Communist Sympathies at the time of their inception, and the rise of militant nationalism as anything else.

    It’s just as biased to assume the Evil British Empire was responsible for all the ills of the world then to believe it was completely good. History is rarely as simple as that.


    1. lauraljpotter

      This isn’t a post debating every aspect of the various conflicts during the British Empire, but about how it needs to be taught in schools and the debate recentred academically rather than in newspapers – hence why I didn’t go into detail in these. Your points are exactly what I’m saying are need to be discussed and debated. You say that is history is not simply which is what I was talking about with the fact that unless history can be portrayed as good and evil, it is avoided.

      I never claimed that the British Empire was the fault of all of South Africa’s problems – I said that not knowing the history of the Empire impacts our understanding of current events and the Empire had an impact. The fact is that a result of colonising so many countries and our continued influence and power means that we have a part in many conflicts even if we have barely been a part of them for many years.

      Your point about slavery, interestingly I was taught about slavery pre the translatic slave trade. The role of Africans in the translatic slave trade can’t be discussed if it isn’t taught.

      Of course nothing can be without some bias (which I did mention briefly, perhaps I should’ve discussed this more), I fully admit I don’t think the British Empire was a good thing. I believe in democracy – the people of the colonies did not have a choice of being part of the Empire and many people died at the hands of the British Empire, because of greed and so many of them civilians (which is why I only included civilian death tolls, they are the figures that are inexcusable) . A lot of colonial policy was deeply racist. However I have come to that opinion through education and debate, that option should be available to everyone not just those privileged enough to have the opportunity hence why as I’ve argued in this piece that historians rather than politicans need to properly debate this and this debate to be covered in schools.

      It’s this issue of debate that also important with regards to your points about those who fought against the Empire this also needs to be discussed. As you said history is never simple and just as debate over the actions of women’s suffrage campaigns has developed in recent years, such needs to be done with opposition to the British Empire.

      My point with this post was to discuss why as a country Britain does not discuss the Empire and not a discussion of the Empire itself. The examples I gave were to illustrate why we do not discuss it – as a country we do not like awkwardness and I’ve yet to find any historians that don’t admit the Empire did bad things even if they think the good outweighed the bad. Hence the tradition of school history to focus on issues that present us as the good guys. This is also why I brought up the point about the destruction of records, not to discuss the Mau Mau rebellion as I do not have enough knowledge to confidently discuss it, but because it shows that there is a degree of some embarrassment from the British government, otherwise there would’ve not been the destruction of those records, and also shows an attempt by the British government to prevent full historical record from being available. My mention of the Mau Mau rebellion was simply to do with the relation to the records case, I’m afraid I don’t have the knowledge to debate it hence why I haven’t spoken about that.

      To reiterate the point I was trying to make in this post (I’m in the middle of an unrelated masters dissertation so when writing I was a little distracted) , our current position of not discussing and debating the Empire properly needs changing, even if aspects make us look bad. Historians need to regain the debate from politicans and do so with evidence based historical rigour.


  2. Perhaps it should also be taught that the British did not invent slavery. How many people from Somalia and Ethiopia were enslaved by the Arabs, for example or even by other Ethiopians?
    Or how many people were enslaved or sold by the Vikings, Persians, Romans, Greeks, Arabs, Turks, Spanish? Slavery existed both before and after the transatlantic slave trade in which the British Empire was engaged.
    Perhaps kids could do with being taught that as well.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s